Nice job of laying out all the pieces. Your final point, on interrupts, makes a reference to the shortcomings of the very software it mentions. Your link to the LinkedIn article lands on AI-written reference copy. It’s thin, and when I tried to rate it, the LinkedIn page choked up. That’s a software interrupt failing. Discerning systems still need human review and test. I’m glad a human wrote this article, which didn’t choke up 👍
Hi Ron! Happy new year to you all! Thanks for the comment and bummer about the LinkedIn choke! I quickly reviewed the page to make sure that it offered high level coverage to give folks context, not details. I make a point of testing the links before I publish, but heck, I am only human and make mistakes too! Let's talk soon. Be well.
Nice job of laying out all the pieces. Your final point, on interrupts, makes a reference to the shortcomings of the very software it mentions. Your link to the LinkedIn article lands on AI-written reference copy. It’s thin, and when I tried to rate it, the LinkedIn page choked up. That’s a software interrupt failing. Discerning systems still need human review and test. I’m glad a human wrote this article, which didn’t choke up 👍
Hi Ron! Happy new year to you all! Thanks for the comment and bummer about the LinkedIn choke! I quickly reviewed the page to make sure that it offered high level coverage to give folks context, not details. I make a point of testing the links before I publish, but heck, I am only human and make mistakes too! Let's talk soon. Be well.
Not your testing deficiency-that’s a LinkedIn snag of its software. Figures that when a human tries to rate an AI article, the comment goes nowhere.
Nice job explaining how systems 1 and 2 work.